Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853975›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Outpatient Low-Dose Initiation of Buprenorphine for People Using Fentanyl.

Leslie W Suen, Amy Y Chiang, Benjamin L H Jones, Christine S Soran, Michelle Geier, Hannah R Snyder, John Neuhaus, Janet J Myers, Kelly R Knight, Alexander R Bazazi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Qualitative study of blister pack use during buprenorphine low dose initiation.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leslie W SuenDivision of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Amy Y ChiangDivision of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Benjamin L H JonesDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Christine S SoranSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California.
Michelle GeierSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California.
Hannah R SnyderDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
John NeuhausDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Janet J MyersDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Kelly R KnightDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Alexander R BazaziDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Phillip O CoffinSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Midcareer K24 Award for Mentoring and Patient-Oriented ResearchK24DA042720 · NIDA · SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PHILLIP O COFFIN · 2016 to 2026
$1.6M
Enhancing buprenorphine low dose initiation (COPILOT)K23DA060329 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Leslie W. Suen · 2024 to 2026
$593k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA060329NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA042720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The rise of high-potency opioids such as fentanyl makes buprenorphine initiation challenging due to the risks of precipitated withdrawal, prompting the exploration of strategies, such as low-dose initiation (LDI) of buprenorphine. However, no comparative studies on LDI outcomes exist. Objective: To evaluate outpatient outcomes associated with 2 LDI protocols of buprenorphine among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) using fentanyl. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed data on adults with OUD who self-reported daily fentanyl use and underwent buprenorphine initiation using LDI. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 2 substance use disorder treatment clinics using a specialty behavioral health pharmacy in San Francisco, California, from May 2021 to November 2022. Exposures: Type of LDI protocol selected by individuals: 4-day or 7-day protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was successful buprenorphine initiation, defined as self-reported LDI completion and pickup of a refill maintenance prescription, and buprenorphine retention. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations assessed associations between LDI protocol (4-day vs 7-day) and successful initiation, adjusting for multiple attempts, age, gender identity, race and ethnicity, and housing status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate buprenorphine retention, and survival curves were adjusted using a fitted Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: A total of 126 individuals (median [IQR] age, 35 [29-44] years; 90 identified as men [71%]; 26 [21%] identified as Black or African American, 20 [16%] as Latine, and 66 [52%] as White individuals) with 175 initiation attempts were included. Across attempts, 72 (41%) had a 4-day LDI protocol and 103 (59%) had a 7-day protocol. Initiation was successful in 60 attempts (34%), including 27 (38%) among 4-day protocol and 29 (28%) among 7-day protocol attempts. Buprenorphine retention rate at 28 days was 21% for a 4-day protocol and 18% for a 7-day protocol. Logistic regression found no significant differences between LDI protocols and successful initiation, while repeated LDI attempts had lower odds of success (second attempt: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.30 [95% CI, 0.14-0.66]; third or more attempt: AOR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.09-0.53]). Unadjusted and adjusted survival models did not detect a significant difference in retention between LDI protocol types. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that among people with OUD using fentanyl and attempting outpatient LDI of buprenorphine, successful buprenorphine initiation and retention rates were low. Future studies should examine interventions to improve LDI success and increase buprenorphine uptake and retention.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineFentanylNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsSan FranciscoAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineFentanylNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID39853975
PMCPMC11762237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.