Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853928›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

MaTableGPT: GPT-Based Table Data Extractor from Materials Science Literature.

Gyeong Hoon Yi, Jiwoo Choi, Hyeongyun Song, Olivia Miano, Jaewoong Choi, Kihoon Bang, Byungju Lee, Seok Su Sohn, David Buttler, Anna Hiszpanski and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MaTableGPT: GPT-Based Table Data Extractor from Materials Science Literature.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gyeong Hoon YiComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1726-4356
Jiwoo ChoiComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Hyeongyun SongComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Olivia MianoGlobal Security Computing Applications Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Jaewoong ChoiComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Kihoon BangComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Byungju LeeComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Seok Su SohnDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
David ButtlerCenter for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Anna HiszpanskiMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Sang Soo HanComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-8105
Donghun KimComputational Science Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-5381

Funding

Korea Institute of Science and Technology 2Z07160Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LDRD 22-ERD-027Ministry of Science and ICT NRF2021M3A7C2089739Ministry of Science and ICT RS-2024-00450102Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2024-00450102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficiently extracting data from tables in the scientific literature is pivotal for building large-scale databases. However, the tables reported in materials science papers exist in highly diverse forms; thus, rule-based extractions are an ineffective approach. To overcome this challenge, the study presents MaTableGPT, which is a GPT-based table data extractor from the materials science literature. MaTableGPT features key strategies of table data representation and table splitting for better GPT comprehension and filtering hallucinated information through follow-up questions. When applied to a vast volume of water splitting catalysis literature, MaTableGPT achieves an extraction accuracy (total F1 score) of up to 96.8%. Through comprehensive evaluations of the GPT usage cost, labeling cost, and extraction accuracy for the learning methods of zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning, the study presents a Pareto-front mapping where the few-shot learning method is found to be the most balanced solution owing to both its high extraction accuracy (total F1 score >95%) and low cost (GPT usage cost of 5.97 US dollars and labeling cost of 10 I/O paired examples). The statistical analyses conducted on the database generated by MaTableGPT revealed valuable insights into the distribution of the overpotential and elemental utilization across the reported catalysts in the water splitting literature.

Indexed as

GPTlarge language modelsliterature miningmachine learningmaterials sciencetable data extractionwater splitting catalysis

Identifiers

PMID39853928
PMCPMC12021050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.