Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853906›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

The Songdo consensus: Development of minimum reporting standards for studies of intervention in idiopathic anal fistula using a modified nominal group technique.

Shivani Joshi, Luke Hanna, Dong Ho Cho, Pankaj Garg, Tamara Glyn, Brooke Gurland, Do-Yeon Hwang, Kiduk Kim, Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Jong Kyun Lee and 8 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Songdo consensus: Development of minimum reporting standards for studies of intervention in idiopathic anal fistula using a modified nominal group technique.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shivani JoshiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6712-1486
Luke HannaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dong Ho ChoDepartment of Coloproctology, Seoul Songdo Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-8579-3626
Pankaj GargGarg Fistula Research Institute, Panchkula, India.
Tamara GlynUniversity of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Brooke GurlandStanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Do-Yeon HwangDepartment of Coloproctology, Seoul Songdo Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kiduk KimDepartment of Coloproctology, Seoul Songdo Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Paulo Gustavo KotzePontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Jong Kyun LeeDepartment of Coloproctology, Seoul Songdo Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Amy L LightnerScripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA.
Klaus E MatzelDepartment of Coloproctology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Kapil SahnanRobin Phillips' Fistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Francis Seow-ChoenSeow-Choen Colorectal Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Ali ShafikKasr Al-Aini Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Daeyoun WonDepartment of Coloproctology, Seoul Songdo Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
David D E ZimmermanElisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Phil J TozerRobin Phillips' Fistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCryptoglandular anal fistulas carry a substantial burden to quality of life. Surgery is the only effective curative treatment but requires balancing fistula healing against pain, wounds and continence impairment. Sphincter-preserving procedures do exist but demonstrate variable rates of success. A lack of consistency and precision in outcome reporting and methodological quality hinders effective evidence-based decision-making. We aimed to establish a series of minimum reporting standards for interventional studies in idiopathic anal fistula, to eradicate low-quality studies, thus providing a consistent baseline of useful evidence.

methodsAn international group of 16 experts participated in a modified nominal group technique consensus. The nominal question was: 'What should be the minimum set of reporting standards for studies of intervention in idiopathic anal fistula?' The process was conducted between May and June 2023, culminating in a hybrid in-person/virtual meeting that took place at the Songdo International Proctology Symposium in June 2023.

resultsInitial idea generation resulted in 37 statements within the first round. Themes included variable reporting of follow-up and incontinence. Participants indicated their agreement via a 9-point Likert scale. Any statement achieving >70% consensus was retained. Subsequent group discussion condensed the list to 11 statements for further voting and a final minimum set of 12 reporting standards was created.

conclusionTo date, this is the first study dedicated to developing minimum reporting standards for interventional studies in idiopathic anal fistula using a modified nominal group technique. These standards will instruct researchers in producing meticulous, high-quality studies that are accurate, transparent and reproducible.

Indexed as

Rectal FistulaResearch DesignFecal IncontinenceHumansanal fistulacryptoglandular anal fistulaidiopathic anal fistulaminimum reporting standardsnominal group technique

Identifiers

PMID39853906
PMCPMC11758350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.