Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853810›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Between- and Within-Cluster Spearman Rank Correlations.

Shengxin Tu, Chun Li, Bryan E Shepherd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shengxin TuDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-8903
Chun LiDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Bryan E ShepherdDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Tennessee CFAR: Implementation of Culturally Responsive Trauma-Informed Care with Youth with HIV in Memphis, TNP30AI110527 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Chandravanu Dash · 2015 to 2026
$27.5M
Statistical Methods for Ordinal Variables in HIV/AIDS StudiesR01AI093234 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Chun Li, Bryan Earl Shepherd · 2011 to 2026
$4.9M
Partners-based HIV Treatment for Sero-concordant Couples attending Antenatal Care: Increasing family-based support for PrEP adherence among discordant couples through storytellingR01MH113478 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI AUDET, CAROLYN · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
The dynamics of HIV, aging, and T lymphocyte exhaustionK23AI120875 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASTILHO, JESSICA L · 2016 to 2020
$867k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI120875NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI110527NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093234NIH HHS K23AI120875NIH HHS P30AI110527NIH HHS R01AI093234NIH HHS R01MH113478NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered data are common in practice. Clustering arises when subjects are measured repeatedly, or subjects are nested in groups (e.g., households, schools). It is often of interest to evaluate the correlation between two variables with clustered data. There are three commonly used Pearson correlation coefficients (total, between-, and within-cluster), which together provide an enriched perspective of the correlation. However, these Pearson correlation coefficients are sensitive to extreme values and skewed distributions. They also vary with data transformation, which is arbitrary and often difficult to choose, and they are not applicable to ordered categorical data. Current nonparametric correlation measures for clustered data are only for the total correlation. Here we define population parameters for the between- and within-cluster Spearman rank correlations. The definitions are natural extensions of the Pearson between- and within-cluster correlations to the rank scale. We show that the total Spearman rank correlation approximates a linear combination of the between- and within-cluster Spearman rank correlations, where the weights are functions of rank intraclass correlations of the two random variables. We also discuss the equivalence between the within-cluster Spearman rank correlation and the covariate-adjusted partial Spearman rank correlation. Furthermore, we describe estimation and inference for the three Spearman rank correlations, conduct simulations to evaluate the performance of our estimators, and illustrate their use with data from a longitudinal biomarker study and a clustered randomized trial.

Indexed as

Correlation of DataCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalStatistics, Nonparametricclustered datanonparametric correlation measuresrank association measures

Identifiers

PMID39853810
PMCPMC11758474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.