ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
The clockwork of insect activity: Advancing ecological understanding through automation.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diel emergence and dispersal rhythms in the bamboo borer Dinoderus minutus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae).Die Naturwissenschaften · 2026Article
- Combining Time-Stamped Insect Sampling With eDNA-Metabarcoding of Guano to Reconstruct Community Interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Environmental drivers of bat activity at high latitudes.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The clockwork of insect activity: Advancing ecological understanding through automation.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding insect behaviour and its underlying drivers is vital for interpreting changes in local biodiversity and predicting future trends. Conventional insect traps are typically limited to assess the composition of local insect communities over longer time periods and provide only limited insights into the effects of abiotic factors, such as light on species activity. Achieving finer temporal resolution is labour-intensive or only possible under laboratory conditions. Here, we demonstrate that time-controlled insect sampling using an automated Malaise trap in combination with metabarcoding allows for the observation and documentation of taxon-specific activity patterns. Furthermore, these recorded activity patterns can provide valuable insights into the underlying ecological processes. Insect activity curves, derived from predicted detection numbers using generalised linear latent variable models, reveal distinct differences in activity patterns at higher and lower taxonomic level. While our findings align with existing literature, they also reveal that the activity patterns of some species are more complex than previously known. Additionally, a comparison of the assessed activity patterns across taxa suggest potential, previously undescribed parasitoid-host relationships. Within taxonomic groups, we observe variations in both the timing and duration of activity patterns, which can be linked to differences in mating strategies among closely related species. By capturing circadian rhythms of insect activity through time-controlled bulk sampling, we can expand our knowledge on species behaviour, ecology and temporal interactions. This contributes significantly to the advancement of chronoecology, allowing for further exploration of the roles of species and benefits in natural and anthropogenic ecosystems, alongside their potentially significant threat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.