ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2025
Understanding Compliance Rates in Suicide Research During the Post-Discharge Period.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Impacts of Crisis Response Plan and Self-Administered Safety Plan Use in Real Life on Key Clinical Outcomes.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Trial
- Suicidal Ideation After Discharge From Psychiatric Hospital: Momentary Assessment Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Qualitative content analysis of reactivity effects and feasibility of ecological momentary assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors in the long-term and in suicidal crises.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Engagement in Ecological Momentary Assessment of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Mixed Methods Study.Behavior therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe period following discharge from psychiatric hospitalization is one of particularly elevated suicide risk. It is essential to better understand risk factors for suicide during this period; however, retention and compliance in longitudinal research can be a challenge with high-risk populations.
methodsWe examined compliance rates in the six-month period following psychiatric hospital discharge among 174 adults (149 psychiatric patients and 25 healthy controls) across three data collection methods: ecological momentary assessment (EMA), weekly clinical assessment phone calls, and clinical follow-up assessments at two- and six-months post-discharge. We examined whether clinical and demographic characteristics influenced compliance rates.
resultsResults suggested low rates of EMA compliance, but strong rates of completion of weekly phone calls and follow-up assessments. Compared to psychiatric patients, healthy controls completed more EMA and weekly phone calls, but not follow-up assessments. Participants who met current diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode and who scored above the clinical threshold for borderline personality disorder symptoms had lower EMA compliance rates.
conclusionsThese findings have important implications for strategies to improve patient engagement in research during this high-risk period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.