ReviewActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Fluid accumulation in adult ICU patients - A protocol for a scoping review.
Review in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liberation from continuous renal replacement therapy due to renal recovery in adults and children: a literature review and Delphi consensus on clinical practice.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Fluid accumulation in adult ICU patients - A protocol for a scoping review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFluid accumulation in critically ill patients is associated with adverse outcomes. However, there is a substantial variability in the terminology and definitions used to describe fluid accumulation. We aim to provide an overview of evidence describing fluid accumulation in critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), including how it is defined, patient characteristics associated with fluid accumulation, ICU population, and outcomes assessed.
methodsWe will conduct a scoping review prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Pubmed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library will be searched systematically. All clinical studies reporting original data and investigating fluid accumulation, as defined by authors, in adult ICU patients will be included. We will assess the study design, the definition of fluid accumulation, ICU population, and the outcomes measured, categorised as patient-important or non-patient important, in the included studies. The results will be reported descriptively. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) on the research question level. DISCUSSION: This scoping review will provide an overview of definitions used for fluid accumulation, and describe ICU patient populations, patient characteristics, and outcomes assessed in ICU research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.