Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853562›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

What matters to mothers: A qualitative exploration of pain and recovery after cesarean section.

Patricia Duch, Kim Ekelund, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia DuchDepartment of Anesthesia, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0003-1991-0514
Kim EkelundDepartment of Anesthesia and Operation, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helene Korvenius NedergaardDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive care, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5988-4563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFast recovery after cesarean section is vital since the mother not only has to take care of herself but also the newborn. Recovery scores are useful tools to measure and compare recovery; however, standardized questionnaires may miss in-depth patient experiences. What is important to women in the postoperative period after cesarean section can vary in different populations, making it crucial to understand the specific needs of one's own population. This study aims to explore what matters most to Danish mothers during the early phase of recovery following elective cesarean section.

methodsQualitative design: Adult, Danish-speaking women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in three Danish hospitals. Semi-structured interviews focusing on women's experiences of recovery, pain, and mobilization both in hospital and after discharge were conducted for 4-7 days following their cesarean section. Baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes were collected from patient files. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using manifest content analysis.

resultsIn total, 25 women were interviewed a median of 6 days post cesarean section (IQR 5-8). Three themes emerged: "Experience of being a cesarean section patient," "I'm doing good - and better than expected," and "Challenges when going home." The cesarean section itself was described as a disturbing experience. The initial days post-cesarean section were described as very painful, but hereafter, many patients expressed surprise at their rapid recovery. None used opioids after discharge. Post-discharge, having a partner's support, especially with other children to care for, was helpful, and moving from lying to sitting position and getting out of bed were noted as particularly painful. Many women requested more information and specific rehabilitation programs.

conclusionsIn this qualitative study of Danish women 4-7 days after elective cesarean sections, the women described the initial days as very painful but felt that they recovered rather quickly thereafter. The study indicated a need for enhanced communication, especially regarding the experience of surgery, pain after cesarean section, and physical rehabilitation plans. EDITORIAL COMMENT: In this qualitative, explorative study, participants were interviewed by telephone 4-7 days following their elective cesarean section. The focus was the women's experience of recovery, pain, and mobilization, both in hospital and when going home. The findings identified a need for more information about the perioperative course, as most participants were surprised and unprepared both for the pain from other areas than the scar and for the surgery experience being unpleasant, and many requested physical rehabilitation plans.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMothersPostoperative PainAdultAnesthesia, SpinalDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative Researchcesareandeliveryenhanced informationexperiencemotherpainqualitativerecoveryrehabilitationwoman

Identifiers

PMID39853562
PMCPMC11757011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.