SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Prediction of facial nerve outcomes after surgery for vestibular schwannoma using machine learning-based models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Salvage surgery following primary treatment in recurrent vestibular schwannoma: surgical outcomes and progression-free survival- a meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based models for preoperative prediction of pituitary adenoma consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of recurrence after surgery for pituitary adenoma using machine learning- based models: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Postoperative rehabilitation strategies and facial nerve recovery after cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery.European journal of translational myology · 2026Article
- [Skull base surgery-where do we stand?]HNO · 2025Review
- Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.Critical care research and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative facial nerve (FN) dysfunction is associated with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and can result in psychological stress and disorders such as depression and social isolation. Preoperative prediction of FN outcomes can play a critical role in vestibular schwannomas (VSs) patient care. Several studies have developed machine learning (ML)-based models in predicting FN outcomes following resection of VS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML-based models in predicting FN outcomes following resection in the setting of VS. On December 12, 2024, the four electronic databases, Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. Studies that evaluated the performance outcomes of the ML-based predictive models were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated through the R program. Five studies with 807 individuals with VS, encompassing 35 models, were included. The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 82% (95%CI: 76-87%), specificity of 79% (95%CI: 74-84%), and DOR of 12.94 (95%CI: 8.65-19.34) with an AUC of 0.841. The meta-analysis of the best performance model demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95%CI: 80-96%), specificity of 87% (95%CI: 82-91%), and DOR of 46.84 (95%CI: 19.8-110.8). Additionally, the analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.92, a sensitivity of 0.884, and a false positive rate of 0.136 for the best performance models. ML-based models possess promising diagnostic accuracy in predicting FN outcomes following resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39853510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.