ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Assessment of delirium in Indonesian pediatric intensive care unit: a psychometric evaluation of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delirium Research in Paediatric Intensive Care Units: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends.Nursing in critical care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study has the objective to translate the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) into Indonesian and evaluate the psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy of the Indonesian version of the CAPD (I-CAPD) in identifying delirium in critically ill children. This prospective methodological study was conducted between January and April 2024 in a 6-bed pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). In total, 90 children aged 0-18 years hospitalized in the PICU were included. Bedside nurses administered the I-CAPD every shift, while delirium diagnoses were confirmed by a psychiatrist by using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the I-CAPD. The mean age was 8 years, with 53% being girl. According to DSM-5 criteria, 55.6% of the children had PICU delirium. Cronbach's α and interclass correlation coefficient for the I-CAPD were 0.94 and 0.94, respectively. The I-CAPD exhibited a single-factor structure accounting for 72% of the total variance. The I-CAPD was significantly associated with pain assessments (r = 0.32, P < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis indicated an optimal cutoff of ≥ 9, with the sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve of 92%, 93%, and 0.96, respectively.
conclusionThe I-CAPD demonstrates reliable psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy for detecting delirium in critically ill children. Future studies should explore the impact of routine I-CAPD screening on clinical outcomes and targeted interventions for pediatric delirium. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Delirium in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes, yet its diagnosis remains challenging, particularly in low-resource settings. • The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) has been validated in multiple languages and contexts but has not been adapted for use in Indonesian-speaking populations. WHAT IS NEW: • This study demonstrates the successful translation and psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the CAPD (I-CAPD), confirming its reliability and validity in identifying delirium in critically ill Indonesian children. • The I-CAPD provides a standardized tool with high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity: 92%; specificity: 93%) for routine delirium screening in Indonesian PICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39853464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.