ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Primary surgery of subcondylar mandibular fracture using patient-specific implant: the Helsinki protocol.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of accuracy of three-dimensional printing and three-dimensional miniplates in treatment of anterior mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Assessment of plan-execution fidelity in a fully digital workflow using custom-made plates for mandibular fracture repair: a prospective pilot study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Retromandibular Anteroparotid Versus Transparotid Approach for Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study of 80 Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscope-Assisted or Skin-Approach Osteosynthesis of Mandibular Condylar Fracture-A Comparison.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Primary surgery of subcondylar mandibular fracture using patient-specific implant: comment.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Primary surgery of subcondylar mandibular fracture using patient-specific implant. Comment by Amnuay Kleebayoon & Viroj Wiwanitkit: author's reply.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePreoperative virtual planning and osteosynthesis with patient-specific implants (PSIs) have become a quotidian approach to many maxillofacial elective surgery setups. When a process is well-organized, a similar approach can be harnessed to serve the needs of exact primary reconstructions, especially in midfacial trauma cases. PSI osteosynthesis of the mandible is, however, more challenging because a mirror technique of the facial sides is often unreliable due to inherent lack of symmetry, and movement of the mandible increases the risk of loosening of the osteosynthesis. The purpose of this study was to present clinical results of the Helsinki protocol concept of utilizing PSIs in the primary surgery of unilateral mandibular subcondylar fractures as the first publication on the subject.
methodsA single-center study of a new Helsinki protocol is presented for surgical treatment of subcondylar mandibular fractures using patient-specific, titanium-milled repositator plates. Ten patients with dislocated subcondylar mandibular fractures received surgery and osteosynthesis with PSI via a retromandibular approach.
resultsClinical and radiological outcomes were excellent; none of the patients had fixation-related major complications or developed postoperative malocclusion.
conclusionsStudy results show that the Helsinki protocol, treating mandibular condylar fractures primarily with PSI plates, is a viable treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.