ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Efficacy of intralesional pentoxifylline versus intralesional steroid versus intralesional vitamin D in treatment of keloid.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intralesional vitamin D versus triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of keloids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Intralesional injection of vitamin D3, platelet rich plasma versus their combination in treatment of keloid: a clinical, radiological and immunohistochemical study.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Trial
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several treatment modalities have been used for the treatment of keloid scarring but the optimal treatment has not yet been identified. Corticosteroids reduce excessive scarring by reducing collagen synthesis. Vitamin D can curb inflammation by inhibiting the activation and migration of leukocytes. Pentoxifylline is a methyl xanthine derivative initially developed for its vasodilatory properties. Evaluation and comparison between three modalities of treatment for keloid; intralesional vitamin D, pentoxifylline, and steroid. Forty-five patients with keloid lesions were divided into 3 groups; The first group: 15 patients were treated with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. The second group: 15 patients treated with intralesional pentoxifylline. The third group: 15 patients treated with intralesional vitamin D. The response was evaluated clinically, Vancouver scar scale and patient satisfaction scale. At the end of the study, all groups showed highly statistically significant improvement compared to the baseline. The first group which was treated with triamcinolone acetonide showed excellent and good improvement 53% and 47% respectively. The second group which was treated with pentoxifylline showed excellent and good improvement 6.7% and 73.3% respectively. The third group which was treated with vitamin D showed excellent and good 6.7% and 86.7% respectively. Intralesional vitamin D and pentoxifylline are safe and effective therapeutic options for keloid lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39853434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.