Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853430›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2025

The diversity of natural killer cell functional and phenotypic states in cancer.

Kumar Rishabh, Sandro Matosevic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kumar RishabhDepartment of Industrial and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Sandro MatosevicDepartment of Industrial and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. sandro@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of natural killer (NK) cells as immune effectors is well established, as is their utility as immunotherapeutic agents against various cancers. However, NK cells' anti-cancer roles are suppressed in cancer patients by various immunomodulatory mechanisms which alter these cells' identity, function, and potential for immunosurveillance. This manifests in abnormal NK cell responses accompanied by changes in phenotypic or genotypic identity, giving rise to specific NK cell subsets that are either hypofunctional or, more broadly, defective in their responses. Anergy, senescence, and exhaustion are some of the terms that have been used to define and characterize these NK cell functional states. These responses vary not only with cancer type but also NK cell location within tissues. Collectively, these phenomena suggest a highly plastic nature of NK cell biology in tumors. In this review, we present and discuss a summary of these functionally distinct states and provide an overview of how NK cells behave at different locations within the context of cancer.

Indexed as

Killer Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansPhenotypeAnergyExhaustionNatural killer cellsPlasticitySenescenceTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.