Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853427›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2025

Proximal versus distal tenotomy of the iliopsoas tendon in the surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a randomized clinical trial.

Jagar Doski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jagar DoskiUniversity of Duhok, Dahuk, Iraq. jager.doski@uod.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the release of the iliopsoas tendon at two levels: proximally at the pelvic brim and distally near the lesser trochanter.

methodsThe study was a randomized clinical trial. It was done to check the equivalence between two parallel groups of patients with DDH of grade 2 or more who underwent open reduction operations for their hips: Group 1, division of the iliopsoas tendon at the pelvic brim, and Group 2, division of the tendon at the lesser trochanter level. All the operations were done through the anterior approach.

resultsThirty-eight patients (24 females and 14 males) with 54 hips (cases) operated, 27 cases in each group. The mean follow-up period of the cases was 2.4 years (SD 0.6). In the third month postoperatively, children of both groups had grade 2 hip flexion strength. Later, a statistically significant difference (p-value 0.007) occurred between them in the 24th month (Group 1 reached grade 5 and Group 1 to grade 4). More complications, 13 out of 27 (48.2%%), were recorded in Group 2. The complications were active bleeding due to injury to medial circumflex femoral vessels (5 cases) and avascular necrosis of the femoral epiphysis (8 cases). Group 1 had only four cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral epiphysis.

conclusionPatients who underwent a DDH operation with a division of the iliopsoas tendon proximally at the pelvic brim regained hip flexion strength earlier and achieved a better grade with fewer complications.

Indexed as

Developmental Dysplasia of the HipHip JointTendonsTenotomyChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMalePostoperative ComplicationsRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeDevelopmental dysplasia of hipDistalHipIliopsoas tenotomyLevel of tenotomyProximal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.