ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Increased stiffness with medial column screw supplementation of lateral locking plate for distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe propose and assess the biomechanical stability of medial column screw supplementation in a synthetic distal femur fracture model. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four low density synthetic femora modeling osteoporotic, intraarticular distal femur fractures with medial metaphyseal comminution were split into two fixation groups: (1) lateral locking distal femur plate (PA- plate alone) and (2) lateral locking distal femur plate with a 6.5 mm fully threaded medial cannulated screw (PWS- plate with screw). Cyclic biomechanical testing included 5 steps of 10,000 cycles with each step increasing axial loads starting at 0.5xBW (BW = 80 kg) up to 2.5xBW. Discrete stiffness was calculated for each step and cumulative stiffness was calculated across the entire protocol. Outcomes of interest included cumulative stiffness, discrete stiffness, and instrumentation failure.
resultsSeven of the PA models had failure during testing. No failures were seen in the PWS group. PWS had 19.8% higher cumulative stiffness compared to PA (676.3 N/mm vs 809.8 N/mm; P = 0.014). Discrete stiffness showed < 1% differences at lower loads, but increasing loads found the PWS group with 12% greater discrete stiffness than the PA group (879.1 N/mm vs 983.8 N/mm; P = 0.028).
conclusionThis is the first study to evaluate the contribution of a medial column screw in a distal femur fracture model. PWS had superior stiffness and few failures compared to PA. Applied clinically, a medial column screw can increase construct stability in the setting of complex distal femur fractures with minimal increase in operative time, patient morbidity and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39853413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.