Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853401›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Long-term results of staged management of complex lisfranc and chopart injury: a retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review.

Esmee W M Engelmann, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esmee W M EngelmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Jens A HalmDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Tim SchepersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. t.schepers@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim was to assess the long-term functional outcome and quality of life after staged surgical treatment of complex Lisfranc and Chopart injuries in a patient cohort, and to perform a systematic review of the literature.

methodsA retrospective cohort of all trauma patients with complex Lisfranc and/or Chopart injuries treated at our level 1 trauma center between July 1, 2010, and July 1, 2020 with ≥ 3 years follow-up was analyzed in terms of management, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society midfoot score, AOFAS and Foot Function Index, FFI). A systematic review of the literature (according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines) was performed of studies published between January 2000 to April 2024. Inclusion criteria were acute, complex Lisfranc and/or Chopart injury, staged treatment, age ≥ 17 years, patient-reported outcome measures and ≥ 1 year follow-up.

resultsFifteen patients with a median follow-up of 6.6 years (interquartile range 4) were included. First stage treatment involved temporary K-wire fixation (n = 11), debridement (open fractures, n = 4), external fixation (n = 4) and decompression fasciotomy (n = 3). Second stage included primary arthrodesis (n = 4), open reduction and internal fixation (n = 7) or external fixation (n = 1). The median number of surgeries was 3 (2-13). Infection was seen in 5/15 patients; 7/11 patients underwent secondary arthrodesis and one patient underwent amputation due to chronic pain. Overall AOFAS was fair (54.5) and five patients had poor outcome (AOFAS < 49). Three full-length articles were included in the systematic review, reporting fair to good outcome. Risk of bias was serious and certainty of evidence very low.

conclusionSurgical management of complex Lisfranc and Chopart injuries is challenging, functional outcome was poor to fair, postoperative complication rates are high, and secondary salvage arthrodesis was required in two thirds of ORIF patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Foot InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultChopartComplex midfoot traumaFoot traumaLisfrancMidfootTarsometatarsal injuries

Identifiers

PMID39853401
PMCPMC11761783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.