ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Day-case gastrostomy insertion in children: an achievable reality.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecent efforts have sought to streamline gastrostomy insertion care, particularly length of stay (LOS). We report our initial experience with day-case gastrostomy (DCG) insertion.
methodRetrospective review (April 2018-2024) of all primary gastrostomy insertions. Patients discharged the same day as the procedure were defined as DCG. Demographic, operative, and clinical data were recorded. All cases were treated according to a standardized feeding pathway.
resultsOf 432 gastrostomies formed, 15 were DCG; median age 3.5 (0.7-16.9) years, LOS 12 h (9-15 h). The most common indication was nutritional supplementation (n = 9). Gastrostomy technique was single-stage percutaneous rapid insertion of gastrostomy button (SPRING n = 5) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG n = 10). Prior to insertion, 6/15 DCG were established on nasogastric (NG) feeding, 8 did not use NG feeding, and 1 had occasional NG feeds. The majority (13/15) were performed on morning operating lists. There were 4 minor complications; 2 required readmission.
conclusionDCG in selected cases is feasible and safe. Most cases were performed on morning operating list, but fewer than half had prior experience of nasogastric tube feeding. We suggest additional pathway modifications to improve DCG uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.