Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853372›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Surgeon attitudes toward risk stratification in emergency surgery for the elderly: an ESTES cross-sectional survey.

Andrea Spota, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Michele Altomare, Hayato Kurihara, Eisar Al-Sukhni, Lewis J Kaplan, Gary Alan Bass

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea SpotaAcute Care Surgery Research Fellow, UHN Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. a.spota89@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-5089
Stefano Piero Bernardo CioffiGeneral Surgery Trauma Team, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-8901
Michele AltomareGeneral Surgery Trauma Team, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-2678
Hayato KuriharaEmergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-487X
Eisar Al-SukhniDepartment of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-6449
Lewis J KaplanDivision of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1; Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1514-1274
Gary Alan BassDivision of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-9443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur study explores the utilization of objective tools for preoperative assessment of elderly patients by Emergency General Surgeons (EGS).

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted via the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) Research Committee. EGS were invited through the ESTES members' mailing list and social media platforms. The survey included two sections: (1) clinical scenarios involving elderly patients with varying chronic conditions, and (2) participant characteristics. Data collection lasted 12 weeks, with reminders sent every 4 weeks. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel and EasyMedStat.

resultsOne hundred and seven surgeons responded to the survey. Median respondent age was 41 years, with a male prevalence (72.9%). Most participants were from Europe (85%). Key-findings included that 62.6% reported using one or more risk assessment tools (RATs), while 35.5% used one or more frailty scores. Additionally, 4.7% were unaware of any RATs, and 35.5% were unaware of any frailty scores. Decision-making strategies leveraging personal experience with minimal impact from RATs predominated.

conclusionsPreoperative risk assessment tool and frailty score use for elderly patients requiring emergency surgery remains limited among ESTES surgeons. Our study highlights the need for focused education and tool workflow integration to improve risk stratification, decision-making and outcomes. Institutional approaches coupled with targeted educational interventions using implementation science principles are recommended to bridge this knowledge-to-action gap. Future research should focus on developing comprehensive, user-friendly tools and evaluating their impact on patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeriatric AssessmentSurgeonsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleFrailtyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision-makingFrailty scorePatient selectionPatient stratificationPreoperative risk assessmentRisk assessment tool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.