Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853362›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Forensic sex classification by convolutional neural network approach by VGG16 model: accuracy, precision and sensitivity.

Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Mariana Correia, Diana Augusto, Francisco Coutinho, Francisco Salvado Silva, Rui Santos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristiana Palmela PereiraCentro de Estatística e Aplicações Universidade de Lisbao, CEAUL, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa no Bloco C6 - Piso 4, Lisboa, 1749-016, Portugal. cpereira@campus.ul.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-7189
Mariana CorreiaGrupo FORENSEMED, Centro UICOB, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa. Cidade Universitária, Rua Professora Teresa Ambrósio, Lisboa, 1600-277, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0082-0610
Diana AugustoGrupo FORENSEMED, Centro UICOB, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa. Cidade Universitária, Rua Professora Teresa Ambrósio, Lisboa, 1600-277, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-6210
Francisco CoutinhoFaculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0467-7057
Francisco Salvado SilvaFaculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-8090
Rui SantosCentro de Estatística e Aplicações Universidade de Lisbao, CEAUL, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa no Bloco C6 - Piso 4, Lisboa, 1749-016, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7371-363X

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/MAT/00006/2020 CEAUL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the reconstructive phase of medico-legal human identification, the sex estimation is crucial in the reconstruction of the biological profile and can be applied both in identifying victims of mass disasters and in the autopsy room. Due to the inherent subjectivity associated with traditional methods, artificial intelligence, specifically, convolutional neural networks (CNN) may present a competitive option.

objectivesThis study evaluates the reliability of VGG16 model as an accurate forensic sex prediction algorithm and its performance using orthopantomography (OPGs). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study included 1050 OPGs from patients at the Santa Maria Local Health Unit Stomatology Department. Using Python, the OPGs were pre-processed, resized and similar copies were created using data augmentation methods. The model was evaluated for precision, sensitivity, F1-score and accuracy, and heatmaps were created. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The training revealed a discrepancy between the validation and training loss values. In the general test, the model showed a general balance between sexes, with F1-scores of 0.89. In the test by age group, contrary to expectations, the model was most accurate in the 16-20 age group (90%). Apart from the mandibular symphysis, analysis of the heatmaps showed that the model did not focus on anatomically relevant areas, possibly due to the lack of application of image extraction techniques.

conclusionsThe results indicate that CNNs are accurate in classifying human remains based on the generic factor sex for medico-legal identification, achieving an overall accuracy of 89%. However, further research is necessary to enhance the models' performance.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSex Determination by SkeletonAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networksForensic dental medicineOrthopantomographySexual classificationVGG16 model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.