Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853331›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Prediction of immunotherapy response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative study using MRI-based radiomics signature and programmed cell death ligand 1 expression score.

Hui Mai, Li Li, Xin Xin, Zhike Jiang, Yongfang Tang, Jie Huang, Yanxing Lei, Lianzhi Chen, Tianfa Dong, Xi Zhong

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui Mai *Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li Li *Department of Otolaryngology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin Xin *Department of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhike Jiang *Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yongfang TangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie HuangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanxing LeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lianzhi ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tianfa DongDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 2019683078@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Xi ZhongDepartment of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. zhongxi@gzhmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0713-105X

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515110607National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare an MRI-based radiomics signature with the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression score for predicting immunotherapy response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

methodsConsecutive patients with NPC who received immunotherapy between January 2019 and June 2022 were divided into training (n = 111) and validation (n = 66) sets. Tumor radiomics features were extracted from pretreatment MR images. PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was calculated using immunohistochemistry. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used for feature selection and radiomics signature construction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess prediction performance.

resultsA total of eleven radiomics features with the greatest discrimination capability were identified by the LASSO algorithm to construct the radiomics signature. In predicting patients with objective response to immunotherapy, radiomics score (Rd-score) yielded a significantly higher area under the ROC curve than that of CPS in both the training (0.790 vs. 0.645, p = 0.025) and the validation (0.735 vs. 0.608, p = 0.038) sets. Multivariate analysis identified the Rd-score as an independent influencing factor in predicting immunotherapy response (odds ratio = 19.963, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with Rd-score ≥ 0.5 showed longer progression-free survival than patients with Rd-score < 0.5 (log-rank p < 0.01).

conclusionAn MRI-based radiomics signature demonstrated greater efficacy than the PD-L1 expression score in predicting immunotherapy response in patients with NPC. KEY POINTS: Question How does an MRI-based radiomics signature compare with the programmed cell death ligand 1 expression score for predicting immunotherapy response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Findings The MRI-based radiomics signature demonstrated superior predictive value compared with programmed cell death ligand 1 expression score in identifying immunotherapy responders. Clinical relevance MRI-based radiomics are a promising novel noninvasive tool for predicting immunotherapy outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenImmunotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanImmunotherapyMagnetic resonance imagingNasopharyngeal carcinomaRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.