ArticleThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2025
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Standard Bacterial Culture in Critically Ill Children With Suspected Pneumonia.
Article in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on the current status of respiratory pathogen infections and their detection methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBacterial lower respiratory tract infection, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children who require mechanical ventilation (MV). Microbiologic diagnosis has relied on bacterial culture, but reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with bacterial targets is now available for clinical use. We compared the diagnostic performance of tracheal aspirate (TA) multiplex RT-PCR to culture in children requiring MV with suspected lower respiratory tract infection.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of children (30 days to 18 years) at a single center requiring MV via an endotracheal tube for >72 hours in whom daily research TAs were collected. TAs were collected within 24 hours of clinically obtained cultures and analyzed by RT-PCR using the Biofire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel and compared with clinical culture results.
resultsWe compared the results of culture to RT-PCR for 56 samples at intubation and 74 samples from patients with suspected VAP. RT-PCR demonstrated increased detection of on-panel bacteria compared with culture (intubation 73.2% vs. 55.3% P = 0.048, suspected VAP 68.9% vs. 58.1%, P = 0.17) and had an overall sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity of 43.2% and negative predictive value of 92.1% for detection of pathogenic organisms. Overall, 33.8% of samples were positive by both methods, and 29.2% were negative by both methods. Two samples were positive by both methods but detected different on-panel organisms between culture and RT-PCR.
conclusionsRT-PCR demonstrates high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the detection of on-panel pathogens in respiratory samples from critically ill children requiring MV. RT-PCR use may alter antibiotic prescriptions in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.