Observational studyNursing research
Lessons Learned in Virtual Launch of an Antenatal Opioid Exposure Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Observational study in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic prompted researchers to develop new ways to design and launch studies and recruit and retain participants. Pregnant women and infants are considered vulnerable populations in research, and families affected by substance use are particularly difficult to recruit and retain. Recruitment for studies involving medical technologies such as MRI can also be difficult due to misconceptions and fear of the technologies.
objectivesThis article aims to describe "lessons learned" during the launch of the Outcomes of Babies with Opioid Exposure (OBOE) study, including successes and challenges when working with high-risk infants and families and the importance of engaging participants through recruitment materials and retention efforts.
methodsThe OBOE study is a multisite prospective longitudinal cohort study comparing infants with antenatal opioid exposure to unexposed controls from birth to 2 years of age. Chi-square tests were used to examine refusal reasons among caregivers of eligible infants by exposure group and differences in 6-month retention among subgroups based on social determinants of health.
resultsFour factors were essential in establishing the consortium, implementing the study, and retaining participants: (a) creating venues for collaboration, (b) pivoting from in-person to virtual training, (c) anticipating potential enrollment barriers and addressing them directly, and (d) engaging participants through recruitment materials and retention efforts. With these factors in place, only 5% of caregivers of eligible opioid-exposed infants and 8% of control infants declined to participate in the study because of MRIs. Of 310 enrolled infants, 234 infants had attended the 6-month visit. Subgroups of enrolled infants were similar in retention at 6 months. DISCUSSION: Reporting our successes and challenges in setting up a nationwide consortium during the pandemic may help other consortia that need to be set up virtually. We anticipated that the serial MRIs would be a barrier to participation; however, few indicated they refused to participate because of MRIs, suggesting that our efforts to address this potential barrier to enrollment were successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.