ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Identify potential drug candidates within a high-quality compound search space.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In silico methods for drug-target interaction prediction.Cell reports methods · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of potential effective drug candidates is a fundamental step in new drug discovery, with profound implications for pharmaceutical research and the healthcare sector. While many computational methods have been developed for such predictions and have yielded promising results, two challenges persist: (i) The cold start problem of new drugs, which increases the difficulty of prediction due to lack of historical data or prior knowledge. (ii) The vastness of the compound search space for potential drug candidates. In this study, we present a promising method that not only enhances the accuracy of identifying potential novel drug candidates but also refines the search space. Drawing inspiration from solutions to the cold start problem in recommender systems, we apply 'learning to rank' techniques to the field of new drug discovery. Furthermore, we propose using three similarity metrics to condense the compound search space into compact yet high-quality spaces, allowing for more efficient screening of potential drug candidates. Experimental results from two widely used datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in the new drug cold-start scenario. Additionally, we have verified that it is feasible to identify potential drug candidates within these high-quality compound search spaces. To our knowledge, this study is the first to address drug cold-start problem in such a confined space, potentially providing valuable insights and guidance for drug screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.