ArticleeLife2025
Automated cell annotation in multi-cell images using an improved CRF_ID algorithm.
Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network modularity reveals context and state-dependent reorganization of time-varying functional connectivity in single-cell resolved neural activity recordings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Microfluidics-Enabled Simultaneous Imaging of Neural Activity and Behavior in Chemically Stimulated, Head-FixedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- HarnessingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microfluidic Localized Hydrogel Polymerization Enables Simultaneous Recording of Neural Activity and Behavior inReaction chemistry & engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell identification is an important yet difficult process in data analysis of biological images. Previously, we developed an automated cell identification method called CRF_ID and demonstrated its high performance in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.