ArticleToxics2025
A Proof-of-Concept for Safety Evaluation of Inhalation Exposure to Known Respiratory Irritants Using In Vitro and In Silico Methods.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human in vitro airway models to assess point-of-contact respiratory toxicity of surfactants and derive human equivalent concentrations after single dose exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- A Novel Air-Liquid Interface Exposure System for Continuous Gas Exposure of Airway Epithelial Cells: Exposure of NOJournal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- NAMs for closing knowledge gaps in assessment of respiratory uptake - a PARC project.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Establishing scientific confidence: human biological relevance of reconstructed human respiratory epithelium (RHRE) for assessing respiratory effects.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Bionic breathing-type airway exposure system for inhalation exposure studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is increased interest in developing non-animal test systems for inhalation exposure safety assessments. However, defined methodologies are absent for predicting local respiratory effects from inhalation exposure to irritants. The current study introduces a concept for applying in vitro and in silico methods for inhalation exposure safety assessment. Three in vitro systems, representing the upper (MucilAir™-nasal epithelial tissue) and lower (A549 cells and human precision-cut lung slices) human respiratory regions, were exposed to six respiratory irritants. These irritant exposures were conducted as liquid droplets, aerosol, or vapors, and samples were collected over 24 h. Cytotoxicity, cytokine release, epithelial resistance, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial membrane potential were measured. To determine the human relevance of in vitro exposures, airway surface depositions were predicted by simulating airborne concentrations equivalent to the Cramer class III inhalation threshold of toxicological concern limit of 0.47 mg/person/day using an in silico model. A > 100-fold margin of exposure was calculated comparing lowest concentrations showing in vitro effects to in silico simulated values. While further studies are needed, this manuscript presents a basic requirement for employing non-animal methods to inform inhalation exposure safety assessments by combining in vitro and in silico assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.