Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853033›Full record

ArticleToxics2025

A Proof-of-Concept for Safety Evaluation of Inhalation Exposure to Known Respiratory Irritants Using In Vitro and In Silico Methods.

Nikaeta Sadekar, Holger Peter Behrsing, Tanja Hansen, Vivek Patel, Hazel Paulo, Alex Rae, Detlef Ritter, Katharina Schwarz, Anne Marie Api

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Bionic breathing-type airway exposure system for inhalation exposure studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikaeta SadekarResearch Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., Mahwah, NJ 07420, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8329-3720
Holger Peter BehrsingInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-9837
Tanja HansenFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-2570
Vivek PatelInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-1548
Hazel PauloCharles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd., Elphinstone Research Centre, Tranent EH33 2NE, UK.
Alex RaeCharles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd., Elphinstone Research Centre, Tranent EH33 2NE, UK.
Detlef RitterFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Katharina SchwarzFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Anne Marie ApiResearch Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., Mahwah, NJ 07420, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8960-6521

Funding

Research Institute for Fragrance Materials NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increased interest in developing non-animal test systems for inhalation exposure safety assessments. However, defined methodologies are absent for predicting local respiratory effects from inhalation exposure to irritants. The current study introduces a concept for applying in vitro and in silico methods for inhalation exposure safety assessment. Three in vitro systems, representing the upper (MucilAir™-nasal epithelial tissue) and lower (A549 cells and human precision-cut lung slices) human respiratory regions, were exposed to six respiratory irritants. These irritant exposures were conducted as liquid droplets, aerosol, or vapors, and samples were collected over 24 h. Cytotoxicity, cytokine release, epithelial resistance, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial membrane potential were measured. To determine the human relevance of in vitro exposures, airway surface depositions were predicted by simulating airborne concentrations equivalent to the Cramer class III inhalation threshold of toxicological concern limit of 0.47 mg/person/day using an in silico model. A > 100-fold margin of exposure was calculated comparing lowest concentrations showing in vitro effects to in silico simulated values. While further studies are needed, this manuscript presents a basic requirement for employing non-animal methods to inform inhalation exposure safety assessments by combining in vitro and in silico assays.

Indexed as

exposure assessmentinhalationin silicoin vitrosafety assessmentthreshold of toxicological concern

Identifiers

PMID39853033
PMCPMC11769436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.