Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853022›Full record

ArticleToxics2024

The Effect of Cysteine on the Removal of Cadmium in Paddy Soil by Combination with Bioremediation and the Response of the Soil Microbial Community.

Emmanuel Konadu Sarkodie, Kewei Li, Ziwen Guo, Jiejie Yang, Yan Deng, Jiaxin Shi, Yulong Peng, Yuli Jiang, Huidan Jiang, Hongwei Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emmanuel Konadu SarkodieSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5483-0411
Kewei LiSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Ziwen GuoSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Jiejie YangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Yan DengHunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Jiaxin ShiSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Yulong PengSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Yuli JiangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Huidan JiangHunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Hongwei LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6048-9122
Yili LiangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Huaqun YinSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Xueduan LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Luhua JiangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.

Funding

the Hunan Provincial Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project No. 2023CX117the Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Plan Grant No. 2022WK2017 and 2023NK2030the National Key Research and Development Program of China Grant No. 2018YFC1800400the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 51909282the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China Grant No. 2022JJ40583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioremediation is widely recognized as a promising and efficient approach for the elimination of Cd from contaminated paddy soils. However, the Cd removal efficacy achieved through this method remains unsatisfactory and is accompanied by a marginally higher cost. Cysteine has the potential to improve the bioleaching efficiency of Cd from soils and decrease the use cost since it is green, acidic and has a high Cd affinity. In this study, different combination modes of cysteine and microbial inoculant were designed to analyze their effects on Cd removal and the soil microbial community through the sequence extraction of Cd fraction and high-throughput sequencing. The results demonstrate that the mixture of cysteine and the microbial inoculant was the best mode for increasing the Cd removal efficiency. And a ratio of cysteine to microbial inoculant of 5 mg:2 mL in a 300 mL volume was the most economically efficient matching. The Cd removal rate increased by 7.7-15.1% in comparison with the microbial inoculant treatment. This could be ascribed to the enhanced removal rate of the exchangeable and carbonate-bound Cd, which achieved 94.6% and 96.1%, respectively. After the treatment, the contents of ammonium nitrogen (NH

Indexed as

bioremediationCd pollutioncysteinemicrobial communitypaddy soil remediation

Identifiers

PMID39853022
PMCPMC11769394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.