Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852990›Full record

ArticleToxins2025

Evaluating Methods for Aflatoxin B1 Monitoring in Selected Food Crops Within Decentralized Agricultural Systems.

Haadia Tanveer, Hannah Glesener, Blake Su, Brooke Bolsinger, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, Lee E Voth-Gaeddert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haadia TanveerBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Hannah GlesenerBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-7625
Blake SuBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Brooke BolsingerSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Rosa Krajmalnik-BrownBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-3524
Lee E Voth-GaeddertBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9541-1958

Funding

Aflatoxin Exposure, Growth Faltering, and the Gut Microbiome among Children in Rural GuatemalaR01ES033999 · NIEHS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, Peter Rohloff · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS 1R01ES033999-01A1NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES033999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) contamination of food crops pose severe public health risks, particularly in decentralized agricultural systems common in low-resource settings. Effective monitoring tools are critical for mitigating exposure, but their adoption is limited by barriers such as cost, infrastructure, and technical expertise. The objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate common AFB1 detection methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and lateral-flow assays (LFA), validated via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), focusing on their suitability for possible applications in decentralized, low-resource settings; and (2) to conduct a barriers-to-use assessment for commonly available AFB1 detection methods and their applicability in low-resource settings. Among four ELISA kits, the AgraQuant Aflatoxin B1 2/50 ELISA Kit demonstrated the highest accuracy and precision, reliably quantifying AFB1 in maize and tortillas across 5-150 ppb with minimal cross-reactivity. For LFA, a smartphone-based algorithm achieved a high presence/absence accuracy rate of 84% but struggled with concentration prediction. The barriers-to-use analysis highlighted the practicality of low-cost tools like moisture readers for field screening but underscored their qualitative limitations. Advanced methods like HPLC and LC-MS offer greater precision but remain impractical due to their high costs and infrastructure requirements, suggesting a potential role for adapted ELISA or LFA methods as confirmatory approaches. These findings support the development of multi-tiered frameworks integrating affordable field tools with regional or centralized confirmatory testing. Addressing systemic barriers through capacity building, partnerships, and improved logistics will enhance AFB1 monitoring in decentralized systems, protecting public health in vulnerable communities.

Indexed as

Aflatoxin B1Crops, AgriculturalFood ContaminationAgricultureChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayZea maysAflatoxin B1aspergillusmaizemycotoxinssubsistence farmingsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID39852990
PMCPMC11769523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.