Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852946›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2025

Cognitive Bias in Adult Zebrafish (

Valentina Gazzano, Asahi Ogi, Francesca Cecchi, Maria Claudia Curadi, Maria Marchese, Angelo Gazzano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentina GazzanoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-2021-3082
Asahi OgiNeurobiology and Molecular Medicine, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, 56128 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2089-7412
Francesca CecchiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5483-6354
Maria Claudia CuradiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-6411
Maria MarcheseNeurobiology and Molecular Medicine, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, 56128 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0194-0702
Angelo GazzanoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9649-2027

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RC 2024/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, the use of zebrafish ( DATA: The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in scientific databases, including PubMed and Scopus, yielding 30 articles. Additionally, one abstract identified through bibliographic screening of selected papers was included. STUDY SELECTION: Six studies were selected for analysis, and their quality was assessed using SYRCLE's risk-of-bias tool.

resultsThree experimental models were employed to conduct the cognitive bias test in zebrafish, focusing on the relationship between their affective state and environmental conditions, cognitive abilities, and life-history strategies but none of the studies adequately reported the techniques employed to reduce bias. DISCUSSION: The cognitive bias test proved effective in assessing the emotional state of zebrafish; however, methodological biases may have influenced the results.

conclusionThe cognitive bias test offers valuable insights into how emotional states affect cognitive abilities, responses to environmental changes (e.g., physical enrichment), and stress responses. Further research addressing methodological limitations is necessary to validate these findings and improve data reproducibility.

Indexed as

animal welfarecognitive biaspersonalityzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID39852946
PMCPMC11768733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.