ArticleVaccines2025
Immunogenicity of HIV-1
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe development of a protective vaccine is critical for conclusively ending the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic.
methodsWe constructed nucleotide-modified mRNA vaccines expressing HIV-1 Env and Gag proteins. Env-gag virus-like particles (VLPs) were generated through co-transfection with env and gag mRNA vaccines. BALB/c mice were immunized with env mRNA, env-gag VLP mRNA, env plasmid DNA vaccine, or lipid nanoparticle (LNP) controls. HIV Env-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies in mouse sera were assessed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and pseudovirus-based neutralization assays, respectively. Env-specific cellular immune responses in mouse splenocytes were evaluated using an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISpot) and in vivo cytotoxic T cell-killing assays.
resultsThe Env-specific humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by HIV-1 env mRNA and env-gag VLP mRNA vaccine were stronger than those induced by the DNA vaccine. Specific immune responses induced by the env mRNA vaccine were significantly stronger in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group. Immunization with co-formulated env and gag mRNAs elicited superior cellular immune responses compared to env mRNA alone.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the env-gag VLP mRNA platform holds significant promise for HIV-1 vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.