MoS

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Carbon Quantum Dots as a Luminescent Platform for Photoswitchable Bioactive Hybrids: Tuning Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibition Through Functional Group Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
2. Towards point-of-care tests for protein detection at the attomolar level via disposable pollen-based nanoplasmonic probes grafted with polymer-based receptors.Biomedical optics express · 2026
   Article
3. Enhanced light harvesting through efficient energy transfer in a pluronic co-polymer scaffolded blend of donor dyes and plasmonic Au-MoSPhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as