ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Graphene-Based Materials for Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Applications and Material Comparisons.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphene-Based 3D Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Emerging Opportunities for MRONJ Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Graphene and Related Materials: Properties and Applications in Dentistry.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimizing the Size of Zr-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Anticancer Efficacy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dentistry Insights: Single-Walled and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Carbon Dots, and the Rise of Hybrid Materials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGraphene, a two-dimensional arrangement of carbon atoms, has drawn significant interest in medical research due to its unique properties. In the context of bone regeneration, graphene has shown several promising applications. Its robust structure, electrical conductivity, and biocompatibility make it an ideal candidate for enhancing bone tissue regeneration and repair processes. Studies have revealed that the presence of graphene can stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of bone cells, thereby promoting the formation of new bone tissue. Additionally, its ability to act as an effective carrier for growth factors and drugs allows controlled release, facilitating the engineering of specific tissues for bone regeneration.
aimTo assess the efficacy of graphene in enhancing bone regeneration through in vitro studies, identify key safety concerns, and propose directions for future research to optimize its clinical applicability. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present systematic review was carried out using the PRISMA 2020 guideline. A first search was carried out on 20 November 2023 and was later updated on 14 February and 15 April 2024 in the databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Those in vitro studies published in English that evaluated the potential for bone regeneration with graphene in dentistry and also those which met the search terms were selected. Furthermore, the quality of the studies was assessed following the modified CONSORT checklist of in vitro studies on dental materials.
resultsA total of 17 in vitro studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 12 showed increased osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, along with notable enhancements in mineralized matrix formation. Additionally, they exhibited a significant upregulation of osteogenic markers such as RUNX and COL1 (
conclusionsThe evaluation of the efficacy and safety of graphene in bone regeneration in dentistry revealed significant potential. However, it is recognized that clinical implementation should be approached with caution, considering identified areas of improvement and suggestions for future research. Future studies should focus on standardized experimental designs, including in vivo studies to evaluate long-term safety, immune responses, and vascularization processes in realistic biological environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.