ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025
Assessing the Feasibility of Using a Multiplex Serological Assay to Conduct Serosurveillance for Malaria Exposure in Deployed Military Personnel.
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Deployment Screening of Thailand Military Units Deployed to South Sudan from 2023 to 2025 Reveals High Rates of Sub-MicroscopicTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Usability, Durability, and Effectiveness of Permethrin-Treated Uniforms and Metofluthrin Spatial Repellent in Preventing Mosquito Bites in the Laos Military.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Simultaneous serological assessment of vector and pathogen exposure to support intervention monitoring and understand host-vector interactions.Malaria journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproducibly assessing malaria exposure is critical for force health protection for military service members deployed to malaria-endemic regions as well as for civilians making public health decisions and evaluating malaria eradication efforts. However, malaria disease surveillance is challenged by under-reporting, natural immunity, and chemoprophylaxis, which can mask malaria exposure and lead to an underestimation of malaria prevalence. In this study, we determined the feasibility of using a serosurveillance-based approach to measure Anopheles vector exposure, Plasmodium sporozoite exposure, and blood-stage parasitemia using a multiplex serological panel. We tested post-deployment samples obtained from U.S. service members returning from regions with malaria risk to assess the potential of this serosurveillance panel. The results identified that some service members had anti-CSP antibody levels comparable to those found in endemic populations, suggesting exposure to sporozoites while those individuals were on chemoprophylaxis. We also observed isolated cases of anti-MSP1 levels that were as high as those observed in endemic populations and in CHMI studies, suggesting possible cases of clinical or subclinical parasitemia. The study demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a multiplex serology approach for conducting serosurveillance for Anopheles vector exposure and Plasmodium parasite exposure in samples collected following military deployments and its potential to support public health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.