Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852624›Full record

ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2024

Claudia Meyer, Den-Ching A Lee, Michele Callisaya, Morag E Taylor, Katherine Lawler, Pazit Levinger, Susan Hunter, Dawn C Mackey, Elissa Burton, Natasha Brusco and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Claudia MeyerBolton Clarke Research Institute, Forest Hill, VIC 3131, Australia.
Den-Ching A LeeRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2693-8606
Michele CallisayaNational Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Monash University (Peninsula Campus) and Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2122-1622
Morag E TaylorFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Katherine LawlerSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1484-1113
Pazit LevingerNational Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Susan HunterSchool of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 0E5, Canada.
Dawn C MackeyDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Elissa BurtonCurtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-8305
Natasha BruscoRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
Terry HainesNational Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Monash University (Peninsula Campus) and Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-6154
Christina L EkegrenRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-6209
Amelia CrabtreeAged & Rehabilitation Division, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-8308
Keith D HillRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-0308

Funding

National Centre for Healthy Ageing - Living Labs Program N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPromoting physical activity among people living with dementia is critical to maximise physical, cognitive and social benefits; yet the lack of knowledge, skills and confidence among health professionals, informal care partners and people with dementia deters participation. As the initial phase of a larger feasibility study, co-design was employed to develop a new model of community care,

methodsCo-design methodology was utilised with nine stakeholders (with experience in referring to or providing physical activity programs and/or contributing to policy and program planning) over three workshops plus individual interviews with four care partners of people with dementia. Insights were gathered on the physical activity for people with mild dementia, referral pathways were explored and 'personas' were developed and refined. Materials and resources to support exercise providers and referrers to work effectively with people with mild dementia were finalised.

resultsThree 'personas' emerged from the co-design sessions, aligned with stages of behaviour change: (1) hesitant to engage; (2) preparing to engage; and (3) actively engaged. Referral pathway discussions identified challenges related to limited resources, limited knowledge, access constraints and individual factors. Opportunities were classified as using champions, streamlining processes, recognising triggers for disengagement, influencing beliefs and attitudes, and means of communication.

conclusionThis study captured the views of physical activity referrers and providers and informal care partners in an inclusive and iterative manner. The use of co-design ensured a robust approach to facilitating participation in formal and informal physical activity options for people living with mild dementia. This study has provided the necessary framework from which to develop and test training and resources for the next stage of intervention (a feasibility trial) to improve physical activity participation for people with dementia.

Indexed as

co-designcommunitydementianursingphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39852624
PMCPMC11767641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.