Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852467›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2025

New Diagnostics for Fungal Infections in Transplant Infectious Disease: A Systematic Review.

Apurva Akkad, Neha Nanda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Apurva AkkadDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo St., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Neha NandaDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo St., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal infections are common in highly immunosuppressed, solid organ transplant recipients. They can be quite difficult to diagnose in a timely manner; thus, we present a review of current studies focusing on broad categories of molecular diagnostics, i.e., metagenomic sequencing, magnetic resonance, and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. We further discuss their syndrome-specific utilization in the diagnosis of fungemia and disseminated disease, pneumonia, and central nervous system infections. We assess the level of evidence of their utility as fungal diagnostics particularly in solid organ transplant recipients using the STARD criteria. In addition, we provide future research directions to substantiate and appropriately utilize these platforms in clinical practice. Directed polymerase chain reaction testing and targeted metagenomic sequencing are being used clinically and show the most promise, though only in conjunction with conventional methods at this time. The majority of these platforms contain limited data, and thus further larger studies are needed in order to properly implement their use.

Indexed as

fungal diagnosticsgas chromatographymagnetic resonancemetagenomic sequencingmolecular diagnosticstransplant infectious disease

Identifiers

PMID39852467
PMCPMC11767199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.