ArticleMetabolites2025
LC-MS-Based Global Metabolic Profiles of Alternative Blood Specimens Collected by Microsampling.
Article in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An LC-MS untargeted metabolomic comparison between three blood microsampling devices, whole blood, and plasma.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- RPLC- and HILIC-based non-targeted metabolomics workflow for blood microsamples.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Connecting the Dots: Bridging Microsamples and Conventional Blood Matrices in Metabolic Biomarker Analysis.Analytical science advances · 2025Review
- Miniaturised Extraction Techniques in Personalised Medicine: Analytical Opportunities and Translational Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a streamlined workflow for proteomic analysis of proteins and post-translational modifications from dried blood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood microsampling (BμS) has recently emerged as an interesting approach in the analysis of endogenous metabolites but also in metabolomics applications. Their non-invasive way of use and the simplified logistics that they offer renders these technologies highly attractive in large-scale studies, especially the novel quantitative microsampling approaches such as VAMs or qDBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.