Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852342›Full record

ReviewEuropean thyroid journal2025

Newborn screening and the screening laboratory: past, present and future.

Anita Boelen, Annemieke C Heijboer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Thyroid dysfunction in ageing populations.Endocrine connections · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anita BoelenEndocrine Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-2918
Annemieke C HeijboerEndocrine Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6712-9955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid hormone (TH) is essential for brain development in utero and during the first 2 to 3 years of life. The negative effects of TH deficiency on brain development are irreversible. Early detection of TH deficiency in neonates (congenital hypothyroidism (CH) through newborn screening (NBS)) allows for early treatment, thereby preventing brain damage. Screening for CH began in 1973 with the measurement of total thyroxine (T4) in dried blood spots. The enhanced sensitivity of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) measurement has prompted a shift in the approach to NBS for CH. Currently, worldwide, the majority of NBS programs for CH employ TSH as the primary screening marker. However, a select few programs still utilize T4 as the primary marker, enabling the detection of both primary and central CH. This review provides an overview of the laboratory aspects of the screening on CH from the start of screening to the present.

Indexed as

Congenital HypothyroidismNeonatal ScreeningHumansInfant, NewbornThyrotropinThyroxineThyrotropinThyroxinecongenital hypothyroidismneonatal screeningT4TSH

Identifiers

PMID39852342
PMCPMC11825157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.