ArticleJournal of imaging2025
A Local Adversarial Attack with a Maximum Aggregated Region Sparseness Strategy for 3D Objects.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing reliance on deep neural network-based object detection models in various applications has raised significant security concerns due to their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. In physical 3D environments, existing adversarial attacks that target object detection (3D-AE) face significant challenges. These attacks often require large and dispersed modifications to objects, making them easily noticeable and reducing their effectiveness in real-world scenarios. To maximize the attack effectiveness, large and dispersed attack camouflages are often employed, which makes the camouflages overly conspicuous and reduces their visual stealth. The core issue is how to use minimal and concentrated camouflage to maximize the attack effect. Addressing this, our research focuses on developing more subtle and efficient attack methods that can better evade detection in practical settings. Based on these principles, this paper proposes a local 3D attack method driven by a Maximum Aggregated Region Sparseness (MARS) strategy. In simpler terms, our approach strategically concentrates the attack modifications to specific areas to enhance effectiveness while maintaining stealth. To maximize the aggregation of attack-camouflaged regions, an aggregation regularization term is designed to constrain the mask aggregation matrix based on the face-adjacency relationships. To minimize the attack camouflage regions, a sparseness regularization is designed to make the mask weights tend toward a U-shaped distribution and limit extreme values. Additionally, neural rendering is used to obtain gradient-propagating multi-angle augmented data and suppress the model's detection to locate universal critical decision regions from multiple angles. These technical strategies ensure that the adversarial modifications remain effective across different viewpoints and conditions. We test the attack effectiveness of different region selection strategies. On the CARLA dataset, the average attack efficiency of attacking the YOLOv3 and v5 series networks reaches 1.724, which represents an improvement of 0.986 (134%) compared to baseline methods. These results demonstrate a significant enhancement in attack performance, highlighting the potential risks to real-world object detection systems. The experimental results demonstrate that our attack method achieves both stealth and aggressiveness from different viewpoints. Furthermore, we explore the transferability of the decision regions. The results indicate that our method can be effectively combined with different texture optimization methods, with the average precision decreasing by 0.488 and 0.662 across different networks, which indicates a strong attack effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.