ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Typical and Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Chest and Abdomen Radiography Examinations in Dubai Health Sector.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishing the Diagnostic Reference Levels for Common Dubai Health Adult Nuclear Medicine Examinations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest and abdomen radiographs are the most common radiograph examinations conducted in the Dubai Health sector, with both involving exposure to several radiosensitive organs. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are accepted as an effective safety, optimization, and auditing tool in clinical practice. The present work aims to establish a comprehensive projection and weight-based structured DRL system that allows one to confidently highlight healthcare centers in need of urgent action. The data of a total of 5474 adult males and non-pregnant females who underwent chest and abdomen radiography examinations in five different healthcare centers were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The typical DRL (TDRL) for each healthcare center was established and defined per projection (chest: posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral (LAT); abdomen: erect and supine) for a weight band (60-80 kg) and for the whole data (no weight band). Local DRL (LDRL) values were established per project for the selected radiograph for the whole data (no weight band) and the 60-80 kg population. Chest radiography data from 1755 (60-80 kg) images were used to build this comprehensive DRL system (PA: 1471, AP: 252, and LAT: 32). Similarly, 611 (60-80 kg) abdomen radiographs were used to establish a DRL system (erect: 286 and supine: 325). The LDRL values defined per chest and abdomen projection for the weight band group (60-80 kg) were as follows: chest-0.51 PA, 2.46 AP, and 2.13 LAT dGy·cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.