ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Skin Lesion Classification Through Test Time Augmentation and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When AI and Experts Agree on Error: Intrinsic Ambiguity in Dermatoscopic Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Test-Time Augmentation for Cross-Domain Leukocyte Classification via OOD Filtering and Self-Ensembling.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Explainable AI-driven hybrid deep learning framework for accurate skin cancer diagnosis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advancements in the automatic classification of skin lesions using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, skepticism among physicians persists. This reluctance is primarily due to the lack of transparency and explainability inherent in these models, which hinders their widespread acceptance in clinical settings. The primary objective of this study is to develop a highly accurate AI-based algorithm for skin lesion classification that also provides visual explanations to foster trust and confidence in these novel diagnostic tools. By improving transparency, the study seeks to contribute to earlier and more reliable diagnoses. Additionally, the research investigates the impact of Test Time Augmentation (TTA) on the performance of six Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures, which include models from the EfficientNet, ResNet (Residual Network), and ResNeXt (an enhanced variant of ResNet) families. To improve the interpretability of the models' decision-making processes, techniques such as t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) are employed. t-SNE is utilized to visualize the high-dimensional latent features of the CNNs in a two-dimensional space, providing insights into how the models group different skin lesion classes. Grad-CAM is used to generate heatmaps that highlight the regions of input images that influence the model's predictions. Our findings reveal that Test Time Augmentation enhances the balanced multi-class accuracy of CNN models by up to 0.3%, achieving a balanced accuracy rate of 97.58% on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC 2019) dataset. This performance is comparable to, or marginally better than, more complex approaches such as Vision Transformers (ViTs), demonstrating the efficacy of our methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.