ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Combined Input Deep Learning Pipeline for Embryo Selection for In Vitro Fertilization Using Light Microscopic Images and Additional Features.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating discrepancies in accuracy, agreement and interpretability for single-frame embryo classification tasks conducted by embryologists and deep learning models.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Ensemble deep learning with advanced feature engineering for embryo evaluation on in-vitro fertilisation procedures using biomedical images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From the Understanding of Maternal Molecules and Mechanisms to Predicting Embryonic Development.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current process of embryo selection in in vitro fertilization is based on morphological criteria; embryos are manually evaluated by embryologists under subjective assessment. In this study, a deep learning-based pipeline was developed to classify the viability of embryos using combined inputs, including microscopic images of embryos and additional features, such as patient age and developed pseudo-features, including a continuous interpretation of Istanbul grading scores by predicting the embryo stage, inner cell mass, and trophectoderm. For viability prediction, convolution-based transferred learning models were employed, multiple pretrained models were compared, and image preprocessing techniques and hyperparameter optimization via Optuna were utilized. In addition, a custom weight was trained using a self-supervised learning framework known as the Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations (SimCLR) in cooperation with generated images using generative adversarial networks (GANs). The best model was developed from the EfficientNet-B0 model using preprocessed images combined with pseudo-features generated using separate EfficientNet-B0 models, and optimized by Optuna to tune the hyperparameters of the models. The designed model's F1 score, accuracy, sensitivity, and area under curve (AUC) were 65.02%, 69.04%, 56.76%, and 66.98%, respectively. This study also showed an advantage in accuracy and a similar AUC when compared with the recent ensemble method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.