Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852325›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

Hybrid Quality-Based Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review.

Bihi Sabiri, Amal Khtira, Bouchra El Asri, Maryem Rhanoui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bihi SabiriIMS Team, ADMIR Laboratory, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10130, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-568X
Amal KhtiraLASTIMI Laboratory, EST Salé, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Salé 11060, Morocco.ORCID 0009-0007-3316-8044
Bouchra El AsriIMS Team, ADMIR Laboratory, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10130, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-8502-4623
Maryem RhanouiLaboratory Health Systemic Process (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0147-8466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As technology develops, consumer behavior and how people search for what they want are constantly evolving. Online shopping has fundamentally changed the e-commerce industry. Although there are more products available than ever before, only a small portion of them are noticed; as a result, a few items gain disproportionate attention. Recommender systems can help to increase the visibility of lesser-known products. Major technology businesses have adopted these technologies as essential offerings, resulting in better user experiences and more sales. As a result, recommender systems have achieved considerable economic, social, and global advancements. Companies are improving their algorithms with hybrid techniques that combine more recommendation methodologies as these systems are a major research focus. This review provides a thorough examination of several hybrid models by combining ideas from the current research and emphasizing their practical uses, strengths, and limits. The review identifies special problems and opportunities for designing and implementing hybrid recommender systems by focusing on the unique aspects of big data, notably volume, velocity, and variety. Adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and the principles developed by Kitchenham and Charters guarantees that the assessment process is transparent and high in quality. The current aim is to conduct a systematic review of several recent developments in the area of hybrid recommender systems. The study covers the state of the art of the relevant research over the last four years regarding four knowledge bases (ACM, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Springer), as well as all Web of Science articles regardless of their date of publication. This study employs ASReview, an open-source application that uses active learning to help academics filter literature efficiently. This study aims to assess the progress achieved in the field of hybrid recommender systems to identify frequently used recommender approaches, explore the technical context, highlight gaps in the existing research, and position our future research in relation to the current studies.

Indexed as

big datahybrid quality-based recommendationsstrategy recommender systemssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39852325
PMCPMC11766242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.