ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Hybrid Quality-Based Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As technology develops, consumer behavior and how people search for what they want are constantly evolving. Online shopping has fundamentally changed the e-commerce industry. Although there are more products available than ever before, only a small portion of them are noticed; as a result, a few items gain disproportionate attention. Recommender systems can help to increase the visibility of lesser-known products. Major technology businesses have adopted these technologies as essential offerings, resulting in better user experiences and more sales. As a result, recommender systems have achieved considerable economic, social, and global advancements. Companies are improving their algorithms with hybrid techniques that combine more recommendation methodologies as these systems are a major research focus. This review provides a thorough examination of several hybrid models by combining ideas from the current research and emphasizing their practical uses, strengths, and limits. The review identifies special problems and opportunities for designing and implementing hybrid recommender systems by focusing on the unique aspects of big data, notably volume, velocity, and variety. Adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and the principles developed by Kitchenham and Charters guarantees that the assessment process is transparent and high in quality. The current aim is to conduct a systematic review of several recent developments in the area of hybrid recommender systems. The study covers the state of the art of the relevant research over the last four years regarding four knowledge bases (ACM, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Springer), as well as all Web of Science articles regardless of their date of publication. This study employs ASReview, an open-source application that uses active learning to help academics filter literature efficiently. This study aims to assess the progress achieved in the field of hybrid recommender systems to identify frequently used recommender approaches, explore the technical context, highlight gaps in the existing research, and position our future research in relation to the current studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.