Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852324›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models for Accurate Prescription Label Identification and Information Retrieval for the Elderly in Northern East of Thailand.

Parinya Thetbanthad, Benjaporn Sathanarugsawait, Prasong Praneetpolgrang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parinya ThetbanthadSchool of Information Technology, Sripatum University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Benjaporn SathanarugsawaitSchool of Information Technology, Sripatum University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Prasong PraneetpolgrangSchool of Information Technology, Sripatum University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a novel AI-driven approach to support elderly patients in Thailand with medication management, focusing on accurate drug label interpretation. Two model architectures were explored: a Two-Stage Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and Large Language Model (LLM) pipeline combining EasyOCR with Qwen2-72b-instruct and a Uni-Stage Visual Question Answering (VQA) model using Qwen2-72b-VL. Both models operated in a zero-shot capacity, utilizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with DrugBank references to ensure contextual relevance and accuracy. Performance was evaluated on a dataset of 100 diverse prescription labels from Thai healthcare facilities, using RAG Assessment (RAGAs) metrics to assess Context Recall, Factual Correctness, Faithfulness, and Semantic Similarity. The Two-Stage model achieved high accuracy (94%) and strong RAGAs scores, particularly in Context Recall (0.88) and Semantic Similarity (0.91), making it well-suited for complex medication instructions. In contrast, the Uni-Stage model delivered faster response times, making it practical for high-volume environments such as pharmacies. This study demonstrates the potential of zero-shot AI models in addressing medication management challenges for the elderly by providing clear, accurate, and contextually relevant label interpretations. The findings underscore the adaptability of AI in healthcare, balancing accuracy and efficiency to meet various real-world needs.

Indexed as

AI in healthcareLLM in healthcaremedical image understandingprescription label identificationvisual question answering

Identifiers

PMID39852324
PMCPMC11765698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.