ArticleMembranes2025
A Study on the Safety and Efficacy of an Innovative Hydrophilic Dialysis Membrane.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Online Hemodiafiltration in Contemporary Kidney Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Review
- Data-Driven Operational Bounds of Transmembrane Pressure for Modelling and Digital Twin Development in Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Investigation of a New Polysulfone Dialyzer with Increased Membrane Hydrophilicity.Membranes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dialysis membrane based on a hydrophilic polymer (Hydrolink NV) was designed to enhance the movement of adsorbed water at the blood-membrane interface, aiming to achieve antithrombogenic and antifouling effects. This study aimed to assess the performance and albumin loss of the Hydrolink NV dialyzer in hemodialysis (HD) and post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) with different infusion flows (Qis) and compare it with the hydrophilic FX CorAL dialyzer in post-dilution HDF. A prospective study was carried out in 20 patients. Patients underwent five dialysis sessions with the same routine dialysis parameters: four sessions with the Toraylight NV 2.1 (HD, post-dilution HDF with 50, 75 or auto-substitution Qi) and one with the FX CorAL 800 (post-dilution HDF with auto-substitution Qi). The reduction ratios' (RRs') wide range of molecular weight molecules were assessed and the dialysate albumin loss was quantified. The lowest β
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.