Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852251›Full record

ArticleMembranes2025

Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Blackberry (

Juliana Vilar, Flavia Monteiro, Luiz Corrêa-Filho, Flávia Gomes, Renata Tonon, Daniela Freitas-Sá, Suely Freitas, Lourdes Cabral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juliana VilarPostgraduate Program in Food Science (PPGCAL), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária-Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-900, RJ, Brazil.
Flavia MonteiroPostgraduate Program in Food Science (PPGCAL), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária-Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-900, RJ, Brazil.
Luiz Corrêa-FilhoPostgraduate Program in Food Science and Technology (PPGCTA), Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, km 7, Seropédica 23070-200, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5405-3763
Flávia GomesEmbrapa Food Technology-Av. das Américas, 29501, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, RJ, Brazil.
Renata TononEmbrapa Food Technology-Av. das Américas, 29501, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2891-2760
Daniela Freitas-SáEmbrapa Food Technology-Av. das Américas, 29501, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, RJ, Brazil.
Suely FreitasPostgraduate Program in Food Science (PPGCAL), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária-Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-900, RJ, Brazil.
Lourdes CabralEmbrapa Food Technology-Av. das Américas, 29501, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-0381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blackberry can be considered a source of phenolic compounds with antioxidant properties, especially anthocyanins, which are responsible for the attractive color of the juice. However, blackberry juice quality can be reduced under severe heat treatments, resulting in darkened color and altered taste. Membrane separation processes are an alternative for the clarification and concentration of fruit juices, with advantages as the maintenance of the nutritional, sensory, and functional characteristics of the product. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of membrane concentration on the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of blackberry juice. The juice was first clarified by an enzymatic treatment associated with microfiltration and then concentrated by reverse osmosis and osmotic evaporation. Samples were analyzed for pH, titratable acidity, soluble and total solids, phenolic content, antioxidant activity, and total anthocyanins. The concentrated juices were then reconstituted for sensory evaluation. It was verified that reverse osmosis and osmotic evaporation resulted in juices with total solid concentrations of 29 and 53 g∙100 g

Indexed as

anthocyaninantioxidant capacitymembrane separation processessensory

Identifiers

PMID39852251
PMCPMC11766936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.