Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852228›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025

Navigating the Uncertainty of B3 Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Challenges and Evolving Management Strategies.

Sabatino D'Archi, Beatrice Carnassale, Alejandro Martin Sanchez, Cristina Accetta, Paolo Belli, Flavia De Lauretis, Enrico Di Guglielmo, Alba Di Leone, Antonio Franco, Stefano Magno and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sabatino D'ArchiMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-9635
Beatrice CarnassaleMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-9240
Alejandro Martin SanchezMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4840-507X
Cristina AccettaMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3275-4670
Paolo BelliDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-2466
Flavia De LauretisMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-5324
Enrico Di GuglielmoMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-0804-0679
Alba Di LeoneMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8219-5336
Antonio FrancoMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6773-3848
Stefano MagnoMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-9693
Francesca MoschellaMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maria NataleMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-8941
Lorenzo ScardinaMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-2851
Marta SilenziMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Riccardo MasettiMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Gianluca FranceschiniMultidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-3395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B3 breast lesions, classified as lesions of uncertain malignant potential, present a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to their heterogeneous nature and variable risk of progression to malignancy. These lesions, which include atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), papillary lesions (PLs), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), radial scars (RSs), lobular neoplasia (LN), and phyllodes tumors (PTs), occupy a "grey zone" between benign and malignant pathologies, making their management complex and often controversial. This article explores the diagnostic difficulties associated with B3 lesions, focusing on the limitations of current imaging techniques, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as the challenges in histopathological interpretation. Core needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) are widely used for diagnosis, but both methods have inherent limitations, including sampling errors and the inability to determine malignancy in some cases definitively. The therapeutic approach to B3 lesions is nuanced, with treatment decisions strongly influenced by factors such as the lesion size, radiological findings, histopathological characteristics, and patient factors. While some lesions can be safely monitored with watchful waiting, others may require vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) or surgical excision to rule out malignancy. The decision-making process is further complicated by the discordance between the BI-RADS score and biopsy results, as well as the presence of additional risk factors, such as microcalcifications. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the current diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies for B3 lesions, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to management. By synthesizing the most recent research, this article aims to provide clinicians with a clearer understanding of the complexities involved in diagnosing and treating B3 breast lesions while highlighting areas for future research, such as artificial intelligence and genomics, to improve the diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AI in breast tumor screeningB3 breast lesionsbiopsy methodsbreast surgerydiagnosisgenomic analysis in breast tumor diagnosisimaging techniques

Identifiers

PMID39852228
PMCPMC11766555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.