Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852150›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

GFAPβ and GFAPδ Isoforms Expression in Mesenchymal Stem Cells, MSCs Differentiated Towards Schwann-like, and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells.

Nidia Jannette Carrillo González, Gabriela Stefania Reyes Gutierrez, Tania Campos-Ordoñez, Rubén D Castro-Torres, Carlos Beas Zárate, Graciela Gudiño-Cabrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nidia Jannette Carrillo GonzálezLaboratorio de Desarrollo y Regeneración Neural, Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45220, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-6930
Gabriela Stefania Reyes GutierrezLaboratorio de Desarrollo y Regeneración Neural, Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45220, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0007-3387-9487
Tania Campos-OrdoñezLaboratorio de Desarrollo y Regeneración Neural, Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45220, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7452-3435
Rubén D Castro-TorresLaboratorio de Neurobiotecnología, Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45220, Jalisco, Mexico.
Carlos Beas ZárateLaboratorio de Neurobiotecnología, Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45220, Jalisco, Mexico.
Graciela Gudiño-CabreraLaboratorio de Desarrollo y Regeneración Neural, Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45220, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-6535

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías 185241Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías CB-01-2012-177594Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías CB-01-2012-181779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) differentiated towards Schwann-like have plasticity properties. These cells express the Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a type of cytoskeletal protein that significantly regulates many cellular functions, including those that promote cellular plasticity needed for regeneration. However, the expression of GFAP isoforms (α, β, and δ) in these cells has not been characterized. We evaluated GFAP isoforms (α, β, and δ) expression by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay in three conditions: (1) OECs, (2) cells exposed to OECs-conditioned medium and differentiated to Schwann-like cells (dBM-MSCs), and (3) MSC cell culture from rat bone marrow undifferentiated (uBM-MSCs). First, the characterization phenotyping was verified by morphology and immunocytochemistry, using p75, CD90, and GFAP antibodies. Then, we found the expression of GFAP isoforms (α, β, and δ) in the three conditions; the expression of the GFAPα (10.95%AUC) and GFAPβ (9.17%AUC) isoforms was predominantly in OECs, followed by dBM-MSCs (α: 3.99%AUC, β: 5.66%AUC) and uBM-MSCs (α: 2.47%AUC, β: 2.97%AUC). GFAPδ isoform has a similar expression in the three groups (OEC: 9.21%AUC, dBM-MSCs: 11.10%AUC, uBM-MSCs: 9.21%AUC). These findings suggest that expression of different GFAPδ and GFAPβ isoforms may regulate cellular plasticity properties, potentially contributing to tissue remodeling processes by OECs, dBM-MSCs, and uBM-MSCs.

Indexed as

cell differentiationconditioned mediumGFAP isoformsglial phenotypemesenchymal stem cellsSchwann-like cell

Identifiers

PMID39852150
PMCPMC11764465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.