Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852128›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2024

Identification of Olfactory Receptors Responding to Androstenone and the Key Structure Determinant in Domestic Pig.

Peidong Yang, Tingting Luo, Shuqi Yang, Anjing Zhang, Yuan Tang, Li Chen, Jinyong Wang, Yongju Zhao, Zhining Zhong, Xuemin Li and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Peidong YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Tingting LuoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Shuqi YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Anjing ZhangDepartment of Pig Production, Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing 402460, China.
Yuan TangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Pig Production, Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing 402460, China.ORCID 0009-0004-8611-7230
Jinyong WangDepartment of Pig Production, Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing 402460, China.
Yongju ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 402460, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-8856
Zhining ZhongState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Xuemin LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Ziyin HanState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Yupei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Yue TangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Jideng MaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Long JinState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6055-4692
Keren LongState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Mingzhou LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-7684
Lu LuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0960-1529

Funding

Chongqing Postdoctoral Special Funding Lu L: 2023CQBSHTB3098National Key R & D Program for Young Scientist Lu L: 2021YFD1300800National Key R & D Program of China Li MZ: 2020YFA0509500National Key R & D Program of China Lu L: 2023YFD1300400National Natural Science Foundation of China Li MZ: 32225046National Natural Science Foundation of China Li MZ: 32421005National Natural Science Foundation of China Lu L: 32472857Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2021YFYZ0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory receptors (ORs) are members of the transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor superfamily, playing a crucial role in odor recognition, which further mediates crucial biological processes in mammals. In sows, androstenone can trigger sexual behaviors through olfaction, but the underlying mechanism remains to be explored. To efficiently and accurately screen pig olfactory receptors responding to androstenone and the key structure determinant, we adapted the high-throughput RNA-seq strategy to screen the altered genes upon androstenone treatment in the olfactory epithelium of pigs, yielding 1397 downregulated genes. Of which, 15 OR genes and 49 OR-like genes were candidate androstenone-responsive genes, and 5 ORs (OR2D2, OR8D1, OR8D2, OR10Z1 and OR7D4) were proven as responsible for androstenone-mediated olfaction in vitro. Among the five ORs, pig OR7D4 has the highest level of androstenone response. To further find the structural determinant, we performed ligand-binding cavity analysis on pig OR7D4 with androstenone, predicted seven potential structural sites and further confirmed that F178 and T203 are the key sites for recognizing androstenone. Nevertheless, the natural non-synonymous mutation M133V (rs696400829) of pig OR7D4 was proven to significantly impair the respondence to androstenone. This is the first time the ORs responding to androstenone in pigs and the key structural determinant of pig OR7D4 were identified, which highlights the significance of investigating the role of OR7D4 in pig reproduction performance in the future.

Indexed as

androstenoneolfactory receptorsOR7D4pigtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID39852128
PMCPMC11763519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.