ReviewBiosensors2025
Integration of Functional Materials in Photonic and Optoelectronic Technologies for Advanced Medical Diagnostics.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-sensitivity photoelectric sensing of apatinib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in TACE.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Hybrid TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surface and Interface Engineering in Integrated Photonic Sensors: Performance Trade-Offs, Stability, and Benchmarking.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Multiscale Design and Simulation of CdSe/ZnS/MoTeSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indium phosphide quantum dots: advanced synthesis, surface engineering, and biomedical applications in imaging, sensing, and therapy.RSC advances · 2026Review
- The Ballet of Natural-Product: Carrier-Free "Triadic" Drug Delivery Platforms for Enhanced Tumor Treatment.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Review
- Progress and Developments in the Fabrication and Characterization of Metal Halide Perovskites for Photovoltaic Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating functional materials with photonic and optoelectronic technologies has revolutionized medical diagnostics, enhancing imaging and sensing capabilities. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent innovations in functional materials, such as quantum dots, perovskites, plasmonic nanomaterials, and organic semiconductors, which have been instrumental in the development of diagnostic devices characterized by high sensitivity, specificity, and resolution. Their unique optical properties enable real-time monitoring of biological processes, advancing early disease detection and personalized treatment. However, challenges such as material stability, reproducibility, scalability, and environmental sustainability remain critical barriers to their clinical translation. Breakthroughs such as green synthesis, continuous flow production, and advanced surface engineering are addressing these limitations, paving the way for next-generation diagnostic tools. This article highlights the transformative potential of interdisciplinary research in overcoming these challenges and emphasizes the importance of sustainable and scalable strategies for harnessing functional materials in medical diagnostics. The ultimate goal is to inspire further innovation in the field, enabling the creation of practical, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly diagnostic solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.