Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852065›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2025

Polysaccharide Hydrogel-Assisted Biosensing Platforms for Point-of-Care Use.

Sang-Uk Kim, Young Jun Kim, Tae Hee Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sang-Uk KimKorea Science and Technology Holdings, Ltd., 593, Daedoek-Daero, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34112, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-616X
Young Jun KimSchool of Integrative Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 4, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Tae Hee LeeDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Daegu Health College, Chang-ui Building, 15 Yeongsong-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41453, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1975-2961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care (POC) use is one of the essential goals of biosensing platforms. Because the increasing demand for testing cannot be met by a centralized laboratory-based strategy, rapid and frequent testing at the right time and place will be key to increasing health and safety. To date, however, there are still difficulties in developing a simple and affordable, as well as sensitive and effective, platform that enables POC use. In terms of materials, hydrogels, a unique family of water-absorbing biocompatible polymers, have emerged as promising components for the development of biosensors. Combinations of hydrogels have various additional applications, such as in hydrophilic coatings, nanoscale filtration, stimuli-responsive materials, signal enhancement, and biodegradation. In this review, we highlight the recent efforts to develop hydrogel-assisted biosensing platforms for POC use, especially focusing on polysaccharide hydrogels like agarose, alginate, chitosan, and so on. We first discuss the pros and cons of polysaccharide hydrogels in practical applications and then introduce case studies that test different formats, such as paper-based analytical devices (PADs), microfluidic devices, and independent platforms. We believe the analysis in the present review provides essential information for the development of biosensing platforms for POC use in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesHydrogelsPoint-of-Care SystemsPolysaccharidesHumansHydrogelsPolysaccharidesagarosealginatebiosensorchitosanhydrogelmicrofluidicspaper-based analytical devicepoint-of-care testingpolysaccharidestimuli-responsive behavior

Identifiers

PMID39852065
PMCPMC11763626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.