Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851971›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

The PREPARE Study: Acceptability and Feasibility of a Telehealth Trimodal Prehabilitation Program for Women with Endometrial Neoplasia.

Elise P Legault, Paula A B Ribeiro, Danielle Moreau-Amaru, Emmanuelle Robert, Sara Forte, Alain S Comtois, Vanessa Samouëlian, François Tournoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elise P LegaultCoeurlab Research Unit, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-9576
Paula A B RibeiroCoeurlab Research Unit, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-5812
Danielle Moreau-AmaruService de Gynécologie Oncologique du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
Emmanuelle RobertService de Gynécologie Oncologique du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
Sara ForteService de Gynécologie Oncologique du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0499-8299
Alain S ComtoisDépartement des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC H2L 1Y4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-3220
Vanessa SamouëlianService de Gynécologie Oncologique du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
François TournouxCoeurlab Research Unit, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7945-0714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with endometrial neoplasia (EN) often have multiple comorbidities and a higher surgical risk. Prehabilitation programs (PPs) combine various interventions to improve preoperative conditions and reduce impairment due to surgical stress. We conducted a pragmatic pilot study to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a trimodal telehealth PP (exercise, nutrition, and psychological support) for EN patients. The participants could select their exercise group: (1) a supervised PP (SPP), group sessions 3×/week; (2) a semi-supervised PP (SSPP), group session 1×/week, training alone 2×/week; or (3) a physical activity counseling session (PACS). Out of the 150 EN patients awaiting surgery screened during the 18 months of the study recruitment, 66% (99/150) were eligible, and 40% consented to participate (SPP, n = 13; SSPP, n = 17; PACS, n = 9). The overall dropout was low (13%; 5/39), with no significant differences across groups. No serious adverse events occurred. We observed a positive impact on different outcomes across the different groups, such as in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy quality of life score (SPP; delta = 6.1 [CI: 0.9; 12.6]) and functional capacity measured using the 30″ sit-to-stand test (PACS delta = 2.4 [CI: 1.2; 3.6]). The same-day hospital leave was high in the SSPP group (54.5%). Our pilot telehealth PP seems to be safe, feasible, and well accepted and may procure clinical and patient-centered gains that need to be confirmed in a larger trial.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsPreoperative CareAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeTelemedicineanxietycancerdepressiondiet therapyexercisehospitalizationpostoperative complicationspreoperative exercisepsychosocial interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID39851971
PMCPMC11763516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.